0.06/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.10	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 240
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 03:42:04 EDT 2025
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.44	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e9klryBAhj/E---3.1_31229.p
0.17/0.47	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting sh3l with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# sh3l with pid 31311 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by sh3l
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting sh3l with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# new_ho_10 with pid 31314 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 1200s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting sh3l with 240s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
0.17/0.47	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# Proof found!
0.17/0.47	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.47	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_29, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_38, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_43, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_46, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_53, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_54, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_58, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_69, type, esk1_1: ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_70, type, esk2_1: ($i > $i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X14:$i > $i > $o]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((((X14 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((X14 @ X15 @ X16))))&(X14 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e9klryBAhj/E---3.1_31229.p', con)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax_006, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e9klryBAhj/E---3.1_31229.p', ax_006)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax_011, axiom, ![X23:$i, X1:$o]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X23 @ (~((X1))))=>~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X23 @ ((X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e9klryBAhj/E---3.1_31229.p', ax_011)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax_003, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e9klryBAhj/E---3.1_31229.p', ax_003)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax_009, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.e9klryBAhj/E---3.1_31229.p', ax_009)).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X14:$i > $i > $o]:(((~((((X14 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((X14 @ X15 @ X16))))&(X14 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((((X14 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)&~(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:((X14 @ X15 @ X16))))&(X14 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_6, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_006])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X39:$i > $i > $o, X42:$i, X43:$i]:((((((~(X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X39 @ X42 @ X43)|~(X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X39 @ X42 @ X43)|~(X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(X39 @ (esk1_1 @ X39) @ (esk2_1 @ X39)))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(X39 @ (esk1_1 @ X39) @ (esk2_1 @ X39)))))&((~(X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X39 @ X42 @ X43)|~(X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))&((~(X39 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X39 @ X42 @ X43)|~(X39 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X23:$i, X1:$o]:(((((X1)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X23 @ $true))&(~(X1)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X23 @ $false)))=>~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X23 @ ((X1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_011])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_10, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_003])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X14:$i > $i > $o]:(((X14 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X44:$i, X45:$o]:(((((X45)|~(X45)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ ((X45))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $false)|~(X45)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ ((X45)))))&(((X45)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $true)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ ((X45))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ $true)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X44 @ ((X45))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_14, plain, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_15, plain, (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_009])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X2:$i]:((~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_20, plain, (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X3:$i, X14:$i > $i > $o]:(((X14 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X14 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X14 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_22, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X3:$i, X14:$i > $i > $o]:(((X14 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X14 @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X14 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_26, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_22])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_27, plain, (~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lMary_THFTYPE_i))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_24])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X2 @ X3)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_17])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_29, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_22])]), c_0_28])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.47	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	# Parsed axioms                        : 112
0.17/0.47	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 104
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses                      : 24
0.17/0.47	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
0.17/0.47	# Processed clauses                    : 47
0.17/0.47	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.47	# ...subsumed                          : 8
0.17/0.47	# ...remaining for further processing  : 38
0.17/0.47	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Backward-subsumed                    : 5
0.17/0.47	# Backward-rewritten                   : 14
0.17/0.47	# Generated clauses                    : 28
0.17/0.47	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32
0.17/0.47	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.47	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.47	# Paramodulations                      : 28
0.17/0.47	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.47	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.47	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.47	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.47	# Total rewrite steps                  : 19
0.17/0.47	# ...of those cached                   : 12
0.17/0.47	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.47	# Current number of processed clauses  : 7
0.17/0.47	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.17/0.47	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
0.17/0.47	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
0.17/0.47	# ...number of literals in the above   : 37
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived clauses   : 31
0.17/0.47	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
0.17/0.47	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
0.17/0.47	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
0.17/0.47	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
0.17/0.47	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match successes           : 6
0.17/0.47	# Condensation attempts                : 47
0.17/0.47	# Condensation successes               : 2
0.17/0.47	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2453
0.17/0.47	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 485
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.17/0.47	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.17/0.47	# Total time               : 0.009 s
0.17/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.17/0.47	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.17/0.47	# Total time               : 0.013 s
0.17/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1820 pages
0.17/0.47	% E exiting
0.17/0.47	% E exiting
0.17/0.47	EOF